Ps was injured while working as a master of Eymard's (D) crewboat, at a time when it was under contract with D to service the latter's offshore operations. P sued both Eymard (D) and D under the Jones Act and the general maritime law. Ds filed cross-claims against one another for indemnification and contribution. P and Eymard (D), the shipowner, settled his claim. In the jury trial P's damages were fixed at $25,000, and he was found to have been 70% contributorily negligent, with each of Ds being found to have been 15% negligent. At the bench trial of the cross-claims, the court found neither party entitled to indemnification, but D was ordered to pay Eymard (D), by way of contribution, 15% of the maintenance and cure that Eymard (D) had paid under the settlement judgment. D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.