The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

AMI (P) and Alcoa (D) entered into a contract to design and fabricate an automated greenline handling system. During the construction, P submitted invoices for work not included in the contract. D processed the invoices for payment. They eventually disagreed over two invoices totaling about $500,000. P submitted them to the attention of D’s procurement manager at the end of the project. The manager then consulted the employees involved, and a meeting was held in which handwritten contemporaneous notes were kept. P sued D for the unpaid invoices and D moved in limine to exclude portions of the memoranda and a letter involving those meetings. The district court ruled portions of 13 items inadmissible.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.