Barah (P) leased premises in a totally enclosed office building. Pennsylvania (D) represented that the building would be open 24/7 to enable tenants and others to occupy the offices at all times. D was informed that air would be circulated by a duct system when the AC was turned off. P signed the lease based on these representations, known by the landlord to be false. The lease only required D to provide air cooling from June through September from 9 am to 6 pm. P took possession of the office, and at 6 pm, D turned off the air. P claimed the office became so hot that it was not fit for usage. D refused to provide ventilation after hours unless P paid an additional fee of $25 per hour. P refused to pay rent. The lease contained a general merger clause. P sued D under a partial actual eviction and for reformation. D moved to dismiss for legal insufficiency and was denied. D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.