Jackson (D), after consuming alcoholic beverages at Adanac's (D) restaurant, wrecked his car. Bervoets (P) was a passenger who suffered severe and permanent injuries. P brought a negligence action against Jackson (D) and his parents. Jackson's (D) insurer, Safeco (D), filed a third-party complaint against Adanac (D), alleging that because Jackson (D) was a minor for the purpose of purchasing alcoholic beverages at the time of the accident, Adanac (D) was guilty of negligence per se for serving the alcoholic beverages to him, and that this negligence proximately caused P's injuries. Jackson (D) and Safeco (D) entered into a settlement with P in the amount of $1,250,000. Safeco (D) then pursued its third-party complaint in contribution under the UCATA against Adanac (D). Eventually, after two trials, Safeco (D) alleged that Adanac (D) was liable to it on theories of contribution and common law indemnity. Adanac (D) filed a motion to dismiss the complaint; and the trial court granted the motion as to the common law indemnity claim but denied it as to the contribution claim. Adanac (D) and the Court of Appeals affirmed holding that the contribution claim was to be determined with reference to the principles of the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act. This appeal resulted.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.