Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Hoerger owned a lot on May 16, 1906. The lot was vacant and subject to unpaid and delinquent taxes. Hughes (D) offered to pay $25 for this lot. That offer was accepted, and D sent a check for the purchase price of that lot and two others that were being bought. The check was sent to the husband of Hoerger together with a deed to be executed and returned. The name of the grantee was not inserted but left blank. Hoerger executed and acknowledged the deed on May 17, 1906, but D's name was not on the deed. D put his name on the deed later, before it was recorded on December 16, 1910. Hoerger then deeded the same property to Duryea & Wilson by a quitclaim deed on April 27, 1909. This was recorded on December 21, 1910, five days after Hughes' deed was recorded. Duryea & Wilson conveyed the property to the Board of Education of Minneapolis (P) via a warranty deed on November 19, 1909. This was recorded on January 27, 1910. In the action to determine who owned the property, judgment was rendered to P. D appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.