Broadley v. Mashpee Neck Marina, Inc.
471 F.3d 272 (2006)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Broadley (P) was injured when his foot became caught in a gap between the main dock and a floating dock where his vessel was moored. P sued Mashpee (D) alleging negligence. D denied liability, citing its boilerplate exculpatory clause of the contract for seasonal mooring between the parties. P responded that under admiralty law, a party may limit but may not completely absolve itself from liability for ordinary negligence; and that the clause was over-broad and therefore unenforceable insofar as it absolved Marina of liability for gross negligence and intentional wrongdoing. The district court issued summary judgment for D, holding that the clause should be reformed to limit it to ordinary negligence. P appealed.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner