P and D reside together in a single-family residence in Yonkers. They have lived together for over 14 years, and in 1994 they both participated in a Buddhist 'marriage' ceremony. In October 2003, the parties entered into a 'civil union' in the State of Vermont. P commenced an action seeking dissolution of 'the marriage between the parties' on Domestic Relations Law§ 170 (1) grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment. D is a self-employed artist and receives income in excess of $150,000 per year from family trusts. P has a disability that permits her to perform only part-time work on a sporadic basis. She is currently employed as a data collection associate with only negligible earnings and receives disability benefits $1,306 per month. D paid virtually all the household bills and covered the cost of travel and entertainment. P contributed as she was able to and devoted herself to promoting D's art, maintaining the household and caring for their dogs. P alleges that the house the parties reside in was titled in the name of a trust D established for P's benefit. D became an alcoholic and on numerous occasions became abusive both verbally and physically towards P. D began an intimate relationship with another woman and in October 2008 defendant told P that she wanted to divorce and wanted P to move out of the house. D had P served with an eviction notice that alleged P was a 'tenant at will' and demanded that P vacate the premises in Yonkers. Things got violent, and P alleged a family offense. D appeared in Family Court in Yonkers and consented to the issuance of a permanent order of protection. P then commenced this action seeking a divorce from D. D moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a valid cause of action. D states in her motion to dismiss that New York does not recognize same-sex marriage. D also argues that as there is no valid out-of-state marriage entered into by the parties that New York could recognize as a matter of comity. D also maintains that the parties' Vermont civil union is void and unenforceable.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.