Cherry v. Mccall
138 S.W.3d 35 (2004)
Facts
P bought a home from D. P then discovered a walled-in room in the basement. The room was filled with trash, including rusty plumbing fixtures, bathtubs, sinks, commodes, boards, pipes, rocks, and used building materials. The trash was damp and contaminated with mold. P brought a declaratory judgment action, seeking declaration that (1) D breached the contract; and (2) the walled-in room constitutes a mutual mistake justifying rescission. D asserted the 'as is' provision of the contract as an affirmative defense. D then moved for summary judgment. Eventually, after three partial summary judgments, the trial court awarded D $30,000 in attorney fees making the judgment final for D. P appealed.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner