The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

A dispute over the price of a condemnation for an easement for sewer and water was before the court. All questions were stipulated before the court except the damages due Hinshaw (D) for the right of way. P maintained that P's property value would be enhanced by the easement and that D would have the right to tap into the city water and sewer lines even though is property was outside the city limits. During the trial, P introduced a letter from the city evidencing the offer to D. D objected, but the trial judge allowed the evidence in before any oral testimony was taken. D appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.