Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P was forced to sell his office building to the City of Cincinnati under threat of eminent domain. P held the building for the production of income. P then used the funds from the proceeds of that sale to purchase 80% of the Times Square Hotel of New York, an Ohio corporation that as its sole asset had a contract to buy the Times Square Hotel of New York City. The purchase of the hotel was affected by the corporation. The IRS did not view the sale as a similar one or one related in service to use to the office building; thus, it gave no recognition under 1033(a)(3)(A). P contends that both properties were productive rental income. The tax court agreed with the IRS.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.