Colgrove v. Battin

413 U.S. 149 (1973)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

Local Rule 13(d)(1) provides for a jury of six. When the case was set for trial, petitioner sought mandamus to impanel a 12-member jury. Petitioner contends that the local rule violates the Seventh Amendment and 28 U.S.C. section 2072 (rules shall preserve the right of trial by jury as at common law and as declared by the Seventh Amendment) and inconsistent with Rule 48 which called for not less than twelve members for a jury. (Note section 2072 was changed in 1988, and Rule 48 was amended in 1991). The Court of Appeals found no merit, sustained the local rule, and denied the writ.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.