D was charged with receiving stolen goods. The case was tried before a jury, and the trial court charged the jury on the requirements for a conviction. The court instructed the jury that the crime was 'the acquiring of goods knowing them to have been stolen, or under such circumstances as would lead a man of reasonable prudence to suspect that they were stolen.' D was convicted and appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.