Deason v. Findley
40 So. 220 (1906)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P alleged a breach of covenant of warranty or quiet enjoyment, and not a covenant of seisin. The chain of title shows a deed from Kenneth Findley to John Findley in trust for Murchison Findlay; a deed from Murchison Findlay to William Robertson in 1836; a deed from William Robertson to Elbert Robinson in 1848; proof of the lost or mislaid deed or rather attempting proof, from Elbert Robertson to John C. Moore in 1860; deed from Moore to Fears in 1862; deed from Fears to Olmstead in 1863; deeds from Olmstead and Christian to Jones in 1864; deed from Jones to P. The conveyance of Murchison Findley to D was voluntary. The court found against P and P appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner