Di Sabato v. Soffes

9 A.D.2d 297 (1959)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

D's car careened into a store and injured Ps. The car was not under the affirmative control of D when it crashed into the wall of the store demolishing a section of wall and dislodging coffee urns and a window case which in turn fell on Ps. P's moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 113. The trial court refused the motion and P appealed.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.