Dole Food Company v. Patrickson
538 U.S. 468 (2003)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Ps, a group of foreign farm workers, alleging injury from exposure to a chemical supposedly used as a pesticide in their home countries, filed a tort action in a Hawaii state court against Dole (D). Ps were farm workers from Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, and Panama who alleged injury from exposure to dibromochloropropanesome. Dole (D) impleaded Dead Sea Bromine Co., Ltd., and Bromine Compounds, Ltd. (Ds). Ds removed to the District Court as the two corporations asserted that they were instrumentalities of a foreign state, for purposes of the FSIA. These two corporations had been indirect subsidiaries of the State of Israel, having been separated from Israel by one or more intermediate corporate tiers. They claimed to be instrumentalities of a foreign state as defined by the FSIA, entitling them to removal under § 1441(d). The Court held that Ds were not instrumentalities of a foreign state for purposes of the FSIA and are not entitled to removal. The Court of Appeals reversed. The Court of Appeals declined to answer, the question of whether status as an instrumentality of a foreign state is assessed at the time of the alleged wrongdoing or at the time suit is filed. Ds appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner