Dowdy v. Motorland Insurance Co.

97 Mich. App. 242, 293 N.W.2d 782 (1980)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Dowdy (P) and two other truck drivers from Artim Trucking were driving flatbed trucks. When they reached their destination, the other two drivers unloaded their cargo, stacking it in pyramid fashion. When P backed in and began to unload his cargo, one of the other stacks fell on his leg, severely fracturing his ankle. P sued Motorland Insurance Co. (D), the no-fault insurance carrier for his private automobile, to recover no-fault benefits for his injuries. Both P and D made motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment to D, finding that P did not sustain a bodily injury arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a parked vehicle within the meaning of the statute. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.