Duncan V Commissioner Of Internal Revenue Tc Memo
190 (2018)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P is a self-employed attorney who specializes in workers' compensation cases for police and fire officials. P is a retired police officer. P successfully represented Keith Walker, a former police officer who was injured in the line of duty. P represented Mr. Walker from the commencement of the suit in 1994 through its conclusion in 2008, and Mr. Walker received a lump-sum payment exceeding $360,000 consisting of accrued pension benefits. P received a $2,500 'flat fee' paid by Mr. Walker at the outset of the lawsuit in 1994. After the lawsuit concluded P received a check for $30,000 from Mr. Walker, which he deposited into his personal checking account on November 10, 2008. P did not report the $30,000 on the joint return. P contends that the $30,000 was a nontaxable gift. Although Mr. Walker considered P more than just his attorney but also a friend, he would not have given $30,000 to P if he had not received the lump-sum payment. D disallowed the $30,000 gift. At trial, P did not produce a fee agreement or any other documentation regarding P's representation of Mr. Walker. D disallowed the $30,000 gift.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner