Durrah v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
760 F.2d 322 (D.C. Cir. 1985)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Durrah (P) was employed as a special police officer by Transit (D). P was on duty, and in violation of work, rules left the guardhouse and purchased a soda from a vending machine D had installed in the employees' lounge on the premises. The violation was that D did not report that he was leaving the guardhouse and obtain a substitute to cover Post No. 1 in his absence. On his return to Post No. 1, P slipped on a staircase. He immediately complained of a knee injury and in due course sought benefits under Workers' Compensation. The ALJ denied the claim in that P had violated a workplace rule. The Review Board Agreed in that P knowingly violated D’s rules. This appeal resulted.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner