The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D's life insurance policy covering P's husband issued on September 22, 1967. D agreed to pay P $5,000 immediately upon due proof of death from 'accidental causes.' On December 17, 1967, insured was an accidental victim of a homicide. P met all conditions of the policy and repeatedly demanded payment, but D refused to pay. P was left with several children, no property of value, no money, and none even for the funeral expenses. P was required to borrow money to support her family, while her financial condition worsened. The family was required to live with, and accept charity from relatives. D repeatedly and deliberately refused her demands for payment. D not only refused payment but sent a letter detailing that payout was contingent on the completion of an ongoing police investigation and that P should consider settling for less than the value of the policy. P sued D for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The court dismissed the suit as P did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted. P appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.