Embola v. Tuppela

220 P. 789 (1923)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D got bitten by the gold bug and joined the gold seekers' rush to Alaska. After a number of years of prospecting, D was adjudged insane and committed to an asylum in Portland, Oregon. D was released after a confinement of four years. His mining properties had been sold by his guardian. D was destitute. In May of 1918, D ran into P in Astoria, Oregon. They had been close friends for thirty years. P advanced money for his support, and in September brought him to Seattle to the home of Herman Lindstrom, a brother-in-law of P. D had asked a number of people to advance money for an undertaking to recover his mining property in Alaska without any luck. The estimated value of this mining property was about $500,000. In September, D made the following statement to Pt: 'You have already let me have $270. If you will give me $50 more so I can go to Alaska and get my property back, I will pay you ten thousand dollars when I win my property.' P advanced the sum of $50. In January 1921, after extended litigation, D recovered his property. D requested Mr. Cobb, his trustee, to pay the full amount to P, and upon his refusal so to do, P sued. D denied the contract claiming it was unconscionable, not supported by adequate consideration, procured through fraud, and usurious. The court found for P and D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.