This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D, while operating a truck in the state of Washington in the course of his employment for defendant Shepler, is alleged to have negligently injured P's husband. D is an Oregon resident and his employer, defendant Shepler, is an Oregon corporation. P and her husband are residents of Washington. Washington follows the common law rule that no cause of action exists by a wife for loss of consortium. Oregon allows such an action. P, being no fool, sued Ds in Oregon for loss of consortium. D moved to dismiss in that Washington law should apply. The court ruled against P and she appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.