Exacto Spring Corporation v. Commissioner

196 F.3d 833 (7th Cir. 1999)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

Exacto (D) engaged in the manufacture of precision springs. It was a close corporation and paid it, founder, $1.3 million and $1.0 million in salary for 1993 and 1994. The IRS determined that this amount was excessive and that Heitz should not have been paid no more than $381,900 and $400,000. The differences were then attributed to D. D appealed, and the Tax Court found that the maximum reasonable compensation for Heitz would have been $900,000 and $700,000. D appealed.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.