The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Allied Products Corporation (Allied) manufactures farm machinery. It distributes these products through dealers. P executed a dealer agreement with Allied in February of 1986 and was an Allied dealer until June 1988. Before serving as a dealer for Allied, P was a dealer for D, a Delaware corporation that declared bankruptcy in 1985. In late 1985, Allied acquired certain assets from D in the bankruptcy proceeding, including the D line of tractors and field implements and the right to market those lines through a division of Allied. Allied acquired these assets from the bankruptcy estate free of any obligations D had to its dealers. After acquiring the D assets, Allied entered into new dealership agreements with certain of D's former dealers. Allied and P signed a dealer agreement in 1986. On June 14, 1988, Allied sent a letter to P terminating the dealer agreement without notice. After termination, P returned approximately $40,000.00 in repair parts it had purchased from Allied. P sought to return additional parts which it had not purchased from Allied. P valued these parts at approximately $210,000.00. Allied refused to accept the return of these parts. P filed suit against Allied alleging four claims. P filed an amended complaint alleging that the dealership agreement had been modified 'through a course of dealing' to require that Allied 'accept return of repair parts purchased by P from D's predecessors in title and interest.' The trial court granted partial summary judgment to Allied. P appeals the trial court's finding that there was no modification of the written dealership agreement as to the return of parts upon termination.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.