The land at issue, in this case, was a 140-acre parcel initially owned by Williams (D). D conveyed a portion of the land consisting of almost 40 acres to Bacon, who later conveyed it to Finn (P). D inherited the remainder of the parcel from Williams. There was no direct access from P's land to a public highway: the tract was completely surrounded by D's land or the land of strangers. Consequently, from the time the tract had been severed from the tract owned by D, P and their predecessors had made use of a right of way through D's land in order to access the public highway. Shortly before P brought suit, D began refusing P permission to cross her land to reach the highway. P sued, requesting that the court declare an easement by necessity over D's land to access the highway. D's answer claimed that P's land did have access to the highway on a private road leading to the south to a public highway. The lower court found for P. D appeals.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.