Flooring (P) was a subcontractor that did not get paid from the general contractor, Five Star. P then sued to recover the monies due and named Raddison (D) the ultimate customer as a party. D withheld final payments to Five Star because it knew that the subcontractors were not being paid. The sum withheld was $25,000. P alleged breach of contract and unjust enrichment against D and moved for a summary judgment. The existence of the subcontract agreement between P and Five Star eliminated any type of unjust enrichment recovery. Summary judgment was granted. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.