Flores, v. Southern Peru Copper Corporation

203 F.R.D. 92 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Flores (P) accused Southern (D) of mining activities that harmed the environment for over 40 years. The parties submitted a joint Report and Proposed Discovery Plan as required by Rule 26(f). They stipulated to adjourn the making of the initial disclosures required by subsections (A)-(C) until the Court has ruled on a dispositive motion D filed. The parties are in disagreement whether the disclosure called for by Rule 26(a)(1)(D) should be similarly adjourned. P refused to waive disclosure of insurance policies required by Rule 26(a)(1)(D). D objects to disclosure regarding effort, expense and drafting a confidentiality agreement because if D is successful in its motion, these additional actions would be unnecessary.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.