Fullerton Lumber Co. v. Torborg

70 N.W.2d 585 (1955)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P operates a number of retail lumberyards in Wisconsin and other states. D began working for P in a managerial capacity in 1938. Eventually, D was placed in charge of a yard at Gaylord, Minnesota. In March 1946, D was transferred to Clintonville, Wisconsin, as manager of the company's yard there. On April 15, 1946, he entered into an employment contract. It provided that D could not compete or work for another company for 10 years within a 15-mile radius. In November 1953, D voluntarily quit, advising P that he intended to open his own lumberyard in that city. He thereafter incorporated the Clintonville Lumber & Supply, Inc., and on December 1, 1953, commenced business in Clintonville, taking with him three other of P's Clintonville yard employees. P sued D to enforce the noncompete clause. The court refused in that the restraint was too long. P appealed.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.