Fursmidt (P) and his father had been supplying valet and laundry services at the Hotel (D) for a great many years. On 2/1/58, P entered into a three-year agreement with D to supply those services to D upon the sole satisfaction of D. The contract price was for $325 per month. On September 1958, D canceled the contract and D hired a third person to do the work for $250 per month. P sued D. D claimed that it was not satisfied with the services. The trial court ruled that D's dissatisfaction must be reasonable and gave a jury instruction to that effect. D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.