This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P is the founder of D. P induced certain persons to invest in the company by buying its stock. In 1993 he was removed as Chairman of the board, and his employment with the company terminated. P owns approximately 13% of the company's common stock. P alleges that business has deteriorated very badly since his ouster. P alleges mismanagement. P does not allege any financial conflicts of interests. D moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to show that the preconditions established by Rule 23.1 for litigation of a derivative suit.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.