Garwood Packaging, Inc., (P) created a packaging system designed to increase the shelf life of fresh meat. P failed in marketing its food-packaging system and had run up debts of $3 million and was broke. It engaged Martin to help find investors. Martin told P that D (Martin's employer, remember) would consider investing $2 million of its own money in P if another investor could be found who would make a comparable investment. Martin located Hobart Corporation that was prepared to manufacture $2 million worth of GPI packaging machines in return for equity in the company. The deal was hung up on the equity share and subordination from creditors. Martin promised P that the he would see the deal through come hell or high water. Eventually, D decided not to invest, the deal collapsed, and P was forced to declare bankruptcy. To further reduce its risk D had decided to off-load half its projected $2 million investment on other investors but those investors got cold feet, and that was the reason D withdrew. No contract had been signed, and no agreement had been reached on how much stock either D or Hobart would receive in exchange for their contributions to P. Nor had releases been obtained from the creditors. P sued based on promissory estoppel. The court granted D’s motion for summary judgment and P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.