Gantos (D) submitted a purchase order to Gianni (P) with a cancellation right for any goods not shipped or any goods not shipped on time. D canceled its June 10th order, due for delivery on October 10th, in late September. P agreed to a 50% price reduction if D would accept the goods anyway. P sued D. The trial court found that reduced price agreement was invalid because the cancellation clause was unconscionable. P was awarded $27,290. D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.