W met H in 1949, and H wanted W to marry him. W refused to do so until H made a suitable property settlement on her prior to the marriage. H offered a home, and a housekeeper and P accepted the offer provided that it would be reduced to writing and signed by both parties. With the marriage date coming up W insisted that she would not marry unless the transaction was completed. H then executed a will in which he left W certain real property and one-third of whatever cash H had in the bank. Upon reliance that the will would not change, W and H got married Eventually H made a will that left everything to his children. H died, and the will was entered into probate. W filed an exception to the will in the probate court. W sought a judgment that the execution of the will that left all to the children was in violation of her prenuptial agreement that she had with H and that the will of August 27, 1949, was irrevocable without her consent except if the new will was in her favor. W contends that a fraud was committed upon her and the statute of frauds may not be raised as a defense to shield a fraud.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.