Elaine Glidden (P), a four-year-old, went to go to a neighborhood store for candy. On the porch of the store, she encountered a dog owned by Jane Szybiak (D). P climbed on the back of the dog pulling its ears, and it bit her inflicting some wounds that after healing were in no way disfiguring but discernible on close view. D defended the action on the grounds that the injuries to the child were the result of a trespass to chattels and as such P could not recover for her dog bites. At trial, the court found that P could not be found guilty of contributory negligence toward the dog because of her tender years and therefore she could not be found guilty of a trespass at the time she received her injury. D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.