Goldinger (P) sued Boron (D) for wrongful termination of his employment contract in that D forced him to sell gasoline at prices fixed in violation of the antitrust laws. P sought the answers to a series of interrogatories for the production by D of new contracts entered into with other dealers and the changes contained in them as well as the reasons for those changed. D objected to the discovery on grounds that the contracts were not relevant and that they were protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.