Goodman v.
1973 26 FOOT TROJAN VESSEL (Arkansas Registration No. AR1439SN) 859 F.2d 71 (8th Cir. 1988)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
D rented dock space equipped with an electrical meter to moor his boat. The parties had no written agreement. D's rental payments were often tardy so P began charging D late fees of $10 per month. In February 1981, P increased the rent. In an attempt to force D to become current with his payments, P chained and locked the boat to his dock for approximately two weeks. D stopped making payments altogether. In November 1985, the boat sank during a heavy rainstorm. When P phoned D to tell him that his boat had sunk, D replied that he was not going to put any more money into it. Three months later, P hired divers to have the boat raised. Since that time the boat has been in dry storage at the marina. P filed this action in rem against the boat and in personam against D. P sought $3,000 for raising the boat and $1,200 for the damage that the boat had caused to his docking facilities when it sank. D filed a counterclaim alleging that P had wrongfully deprived him of the use of his vessel and had not properly cared for it. The district court awarded P $2,178 for rent and $3,000 for raising the boat. The court issued a decree of foreclosure on the boat and held that D would be personally liable for any deficiency. The court dismissed D's counterclaim with prejudice. The court granted P's motion for attorney's fees in the amount of $3,337. D filed a supersedeas bond to stay the execution of the judgment and appealed to this court. D argues that admiralty jurisdiction is limited to the commercial shipping industry, whereas his boat is a pleasure boat. D claims that his boat is a 'dead ship' because P chained and locked it to the dock in early 1981, its Arkansas registration expired in 1982, and it was stored on land after being raised. P responds that the court had subject matter jurisdiction because the case arose out of a maritime contract.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner