D contracted with a home health care agency to assist with his 85-year-old wife, who had long suffered from Alzheimer's disease. P was assigned to work in D's home. P was trained to care for Alzheimer's patients, and had done so in other assignments. She knew they could be violent. D told her Lorraine was combative and would bite, kick, scratch, and flail. P's duties included supervising, bathing, dressing, and transporting Lorraine, as well as some housekeeping. As P was washing a large knife, Lorraine approached her from behind, bumped into her, and reached toward the sink. When P attempted to restrain Lorraine, she dropped the knife, which struck her wrist. P lost feeling in several fingers and experienced recurring pain. P received workers' compensation. P sued D for negligence and premises liability. D moved for summary judgment, and it was granted. The Court of Appeals affirmed; P's claims were barred by the primary assumption of risk doctrine. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.