Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Hackman (P) is a resident of the District of Columbia who is a nurse as well as a public health and consumer watchdog. P filed suit against One Brands LLC (D) alleging that D violated the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (DCCPPA) by misleading consumers about the amount of sugar P’s product, OneBars. P seeks on behalf of the general public 'an injunction against D, including that D be barred from selling OneBars in the District of Columbia until the front of OneBar labels gave truthful information about the sugar content of the bars.' P seeks attorneys' fees and costs and punitive damages. The Complaint was filed in Superior Court and D removed it to this Court, invoking the Court's CAFA jurisdiction and traditional diversity jurisdiction. D filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint on grounds of preemption, standing, and failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted. P responded to that motion and later filed a Motion to Remand for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, which is currently pending before the Court.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.