Hall v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
252 N.W.2d 421 (1977)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Hall (P) was a borderline mental retard with an IQ of 69. P worked as a maintenance man in Ward's Store (D) in Cedar Falls, Iowa. P borrowed a floor scrubber and cleaning materials to moonlight by cleaning tavern floors. P was discovered, and a security officer of D interrogated P in the manager's office. P was threatened with jail and D came out of the meeting with four signed documents. At trial, an expert testified that P would sign anything to extricate himself from a stressful situation and that some of the words in the documents could not be understood by P. The documents were a confession of theft of $5000 and a promissory note to D for $5000. P testified that he signed the documents because he was threatened with jail. The store manager testified that the items listed in the documents as stolen would amount to $25 to $35 and that the $5000 figure was P's estimate. P testified about his mental anguish but did not introduce evidence of any physical injury or financial loss or expense. P then testified about his poverty tending to show that he did not have D's property and then over D's objection introduced D's balance sheet of almost $2 billion in assets with $2.6 billion in sales per year. D moved for a directed verdict, and it was denied. The jury awarded P $12,500 and $50,000 in exemplary damages. D moved for a judgment n.o.v. and a new trial and was given the new trial. P appealed from the new trial award. D cross-appealed for failure to grant a directed verdict or the judgment n.o.v.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner