Harris v. Meadows
477 So. 2d 374 (1985)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P was driving east in the far right lane, and D was in the center lane facing west, preparing to turn left. D began to turn in front of P. Harris testified that she blew her horn, applied her brakes, and 'moved over to the right a little bit.' D's vehicle then collided with the left side of P's vehicle in the area of the front fender and driver's door. P suffered a cervical sprain and a contusion, or bruise, to her left hip. D admitted that she was guilty of negligence but contended that P should not recover because P was guilty of contributory negligence. P admitted when she saw D she slowed down and did not apply her brakes to avoid the collision. P appeals from a judgment on the jury's verdict for D, and a denial of her motion for a new trial.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner