Harris v. Peters
653 N.E.2d 1274 (1995)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P entered into a lease agreement with U.B. The car was totaled in a collision with D's vehicle. D's insurer tendered Pa check for the fair market value of the Audi. P endorsed the check over to UB, which under the terms of the leasing agreement applied the funds toward paying the balance due it under the agreement's terms. UB filed a complaint against P, seeking $5,560.48 remaining on the lease. P filed his answer to UB's complaint and a two-count third-party complaint against D and his insurer seeking judgment in an amount equivalent to any judgment which might be entered against P in the underlying UB action. P, in essence, wanted more than fair market value for the car. Ds filed a motion to dismiss the third-party complaint, and it was granted. P appealed.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner