P sued D alleging a breach of contract to wit; D failed to take and pay for 800 tons of corrugated materials per month. A written contract was signed between the parties that stated that D would buy 600 tons more or less. The court determined the contract to be unambiguous and parol evidence could not be used to vary the terms. D was given the judgment. P then filed a reformation suit. D moved for summary judgment based on res judicata. It was granted. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.