Hill v. National Grid

11 A.3d 110 (2011)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P accompanied several friends to a grass-covered vacant lot for a game of touch football. While he was running, he suddenly tripped over an unseen metal pole that was protruding from the ground. P fell on the ground and struck a second metal pole, lacerating his left thigh. P was bleeding profusely. P's mother, Rebecca, brought the boy to a local emergency room, where he received treatment for the laceration. The wound eventually healed, but a permanent scar remains. P sued D, a public utility. D asserted that it owed no duty to P under the circumstances because he was a trespasser on its property. Ps pled the attractive nuisance doctrine. The court granted D's motion for summary judgment in that P failed to make any showing that D knew or had reason to know that children were trespassing. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.