Hill v. National Grid
11 A.3d 110 (2011)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P accompanied several friends to a grass-covered vacant lot for a game of touch football. While he was running, he suddenly tripped over an unseen metal pole that was protruding from the ground. P fell on the ground and struck a second metal pole, lacerating his left thigh. P was bleeding profusely. P's mother, Rebecca, brought the boy to a local emergency room, where he received treatment for the laceration. The wound eventually healed, but a permanent scar remains. P sued D, a public utility. D asserted that it owed no duty to P under the circumstances because he was a trespasser on its property. Ps pled the attractive nuisance doctrine. The court granted D's motion for summary judgment in that P failed to make any showing that D knew or had reason to know that children were trespassing. P appealed.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner