Hill (P), a four-year-old, filed suit against Skinner (D) for injuries he allegedly suffered when D's dog bit him. At trial, there was no evidence of the attack, or injury to P other than P's testimony. D argued that P was not a competent witness because of his age. D appeals a judgment in P's favor.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.