Hoctor v. United States Department Of Agriculture
82 F.3d 165 (7th Cir. 1996)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Hoctor (P) began dealing with exotic animals on his farm outside of Terra Haute. In his 25-acre farm, P raised a variety of animals including big cats. At the suggestion of the veterinarian employed by the Agriculture Department, P made the perimeter fence six feet high. The following year, the Department issued an interim memo that dangerous animals, big cats were included, must be inside a perimeter fence at least eight feet high. The agency claimed this was an interpretative rule interpreting the housing regulations of the Animal Welfare Act. As such, it was not required to follow rulemaking procedures. P was cited for noncompliance and disputed that sanction.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner