A decree was issued that found that fraud had been committed against Rauth by Papierz (D) and others. The decree is listed on pages 311 to 313 Re 5th edition. After ordering the accounting, the trial judge appointed an accounting firm to determine the net sums due and also appointed a receiver. D appealed in that the appointment of a firm to do the accounting was contrary to Illinois law, and he also appealed the appointment of the receiver.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.