P and D executed a written contract for the purchase and sale of an apartment building. They executed escrow instructions dated March 7 which called for escrow to close on or before April 21, 1977, time being of the essence. As of April 21, P had performed their obligations, but D had not provided escrow with the necessary documents. On April 22, D, in writing, canceled the escrow. This action followed. The trial court granted a judgment in favor of P, compelling D to convey the property and awarding incidental compensation. D appealed. D contends that a net price provision and the terms of the loans were too uncertain to permit specific enforcement.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.