In Re Ameriquest Mortgage, Co. v. Mortgage Lending Practices Litigation
2007 U.S. Dist. Lexis 70805 (N.D. Ill. 2007)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P alleged she consummated a mortgage transaction with Ameriquest. Ameriquest ordered from Homestead Appraisal a property appraisal of Ps' future home. D performed the appraisal and prepared a written appraisal report on or that valued the home at $163,000. P alleges that the 'true value' was actually $130,000-135,000 and that D and Homestead 'substantially and artificially inflated' her home's value. This would increase the loan amount for which she could qualify and thereby increase Ameriquest's potential profit. Eventually, the adjustable mortgage rate began to rise. P's attempts to refinance her mortgage were unsuccessful because the inflated loan amount exceeded the actual value of her home. P alleged damages and a conspiracy to misrepresent in counts 2 and 3. In count 1 she alleged a Truth in Lending Claim for improper and misleading disclosures of her right to cancel her mortgage. P requests that we void her mortgage and award any applicable statutory damages and set the obligations between the parties on rescission.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner