In Re Lifschutz

2 Cal.3d 415 (1970)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Housek sued Arabian for assault. Housek stated during deposition that he had consulted with a Dr. Lifshutz for a six-month period approximately 10 years earlier. Arabian subpoenaed Dr. Lifschutz. The Dr. appeared and refused to answer any questions or to produce any documents. Housek had neither expressly claimed nor waived a psychotherapist-patient privilege. The Dr. was found in contempt and ordered confined. The Dr. filed a writ of habeas corpus.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.