In Re Marriage Of Witbeck-Wildhagen

667 N.E.2d 122 (1996)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

H and W were married in November 1990. H and W consulted with a nurse clinician at Christie Clinic regarding the procedure of artificial insemination. At the consultation, H made clear to W and the nurse he did not want to participate in, nor did he consent to, W's attempts to become pregnant. W acknowledges that H did not participate in her attempt to have a baby. W alleges H said it would be all right if she pursued the pregnancy alone. W underwent seven artificial insemination procedures. H was not informed. H became pregnant. W then filed petition for dissolution of marriage. It stated that W was pregnant. W sought custody of the unborn child and asked the court to order H to pay reasonable sums for her maintenance, support of the unborn child, and prenatal and delivery expenses. A boy was born, and H filed a motion for blood testing, which was allowed. H was conclusively excluded as the biological father. The court held that H is not the legal father. W appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.